The destiny of the unevangelized debate

The uniqueness of Christ means that He alone is the way.

The destiny of the unevangelized debate

Specifically, it teaches that Christian baptism is necessary for salvation, [4] and that the Catholic Church is also necessary as "the universal sacrament of salvation", but that some may be joined to the Church by baptism of desire or by baptism of blood martyrdom in absence of ritual baptism, and thus attain salvation also through the Church.

What About Those Who Have Never Heard? Three Views on the Destiny of the Unevangelized

Catholic teaching allows for the salvation of one with genuine ignorance of the Catholic Church, who "seeks the truth and does the will of God in accordance with his understanding of it".

Calvin wrote also that "those to whom he is a Father, the Church must also be a mother", echoing the words of the originator of the Latin phrase himself, Cyprian: The dogma is related to the universal Protestant dogma that the Church is the body of all believers and debates within Protestantism usually centre on the meaning of "church" ecclesiam and "apart" extra.

Theologian John Sanders noted that "Although God's decision on this issue is final, the church has never agreed on the nature of that decision. At the same time Methodism has insisted that all children who are not willing transgressors, and all irresponsible persons, are saved by the grace of God manifest in the atoning work of Christ; and, further, that all in every nation, who fear God and work righteousness, are accepted of him, through the Christ that died for them, though they have not heard of him.

This view of the atonement has been held and defended by Methodist theologians from the very first. And it may be said with ever-increasing emphasis that it commends itself to all sensible and unprejudiced thinkers, for this, that it is rational and Scriptural, and at the same time honorable to God and gracious and merciful to man.

Grant mercy also to those who have departed this life in ignorance or defiance of you. We plead for them in the spirit of him who prayed, 'Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.

Are the heathen really lost?

Since Latter-day Saints believe that all people must receive the proper ordinances in order to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven, today members of the LDS Church participate in a massive genealogical effort to compile names of their kindred dead, and then act as proxies in ordinances performed on behalf of their deceased ancestors within LDS temples.

Mormons do not believe that children come into the world with any guilt, [17] because Jesus Christ atoned for "original guilt"; [18] [19] therefore no one is condemned by original sin [20] and people are responsible only for their own sins once they have reached the age of accountability.

Likewise, they believe that children of Jehovah's Witnesses may be saved even if they have not yet been baptized due to not yet having reached the age at which they may make their own decisions. For all other cases they view baptism as a required "request for a good relationship with God" through faith in Jesus Christ.

We cannot say, and it is pointless to speculate. Compare 1 Corinthians 7: When a person dies, God, in a sense, forgets all the injustices that person did.

The destiny of the unevangelized debate

Itmam al-hujjah and Hanif A similar issue exists in Islamas different authorities within the faith have issued different theories as to the destiny of those who do not know of Muhammad or Allah. Islam generally rejects the possibility that those who have never heard of the revelations embodied in the Quran might automatically merit punishment.

Surely those who believe Muslims and those who are Jews and the Sabians and the Christians whoever believes in Allah God and the last day and does good — they shall have no fear nor shall they grieve.

Conversely, a person who discovers monotheism without having been reached by a messenger is called Hanif. But it should be remembered, Islam also states every community in the world, no matter how isolated, had been sent at least one prophet to teach them.

So, this belief limits the possibility of people not hearing God's message. One view is that "A person who has never heard of Islam or the Prophet If it were asked what his fate will be, the answer will be that Allah will test him on the Day of Resurrection: Those who knowingly violate God's laws will be punished for their wrongdoing.

If they do not do this, they will not be saved. There is particularly controversy over the meaning of the word " Sabians ". The long presence of Islam in South Asia, however, has engendered many debates about the status of Hindus, which has run the whole gamut between a more standard dismissal of Hinduism as shirkor polytheism, to some Muslims, such as Mirza Mazhar Jan-e-Janaan [51] even going so far as to recognize Rama and Krishna as Prophets of Islam not explicitly mentioned in Muslim scripture — thereby making Hindus equivalent to Christians or Jews.

Other positions[ edit ] The problem of the unevangelized does not arise in religious or spiritual traditions such as DeismPandeismand Pantheismwhich do not include any revelation or require obedience to revealed rules. In Deism, some believe that individuals will be judged by one's obedience to natural laws of right and wrong to be obtained by the exercise of reason alone, and so, failure to exercise reason in the effort to make this determination is itself the cause for punishment.

In Buddhismall souls, whether evangelized or not, will continue to be reincarnated until they have achieved Nirvana. However, Buddhist scholars[ who?

They are described as those who lived before the time of Jesus and therefore unable to enter Purgatory or Heaven. Amongst them is VirgilDante's guide through Hell and Purgatory.The Destiny of the Unevangelized Debate: The problem of the destiny of the unevangelized is a debate that concerns all thinking - Research Paper Example.

The Destiny of the Unevangelized Debate: The problem of the destiny of the unevangelized is a debate that concerns all thinking Christians, whether they are Calvinistic or Arminian in their thinking. This paper evaluates the debate on the destiny of the unevangelized and analysis the philosophical arguments used to support the various positions on this debate.

Also, the paper evaluates the biblical verses used to support the arguments, and at the end of the paper, a clear position is taken based on the critical analysis of the issues raised.

Preamble For a good part of the past two millennia there has been a debate that has surfaced with intensity at varying times throughout Christian history. To date no major section of the Christian church has chosen to speak dogmatically about the issue, and so the private church member, the local congregation, and denominational.

This paper is written in response to Chapters 12 (The Destiny of the Unevangelized Debate) and 18 (The Hell Debate) of the book, Across the Spectrum: Understanding Issues in Evangelical Theology (Boyd & Eddy, editors).

Three Views on the Destiny of the Unevangelized, ed. John Sanders (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, ), The doctrine of “justification by faith” in Romans especially has been the subject of intense debate. In the first five chapters of this letter, Paul lays out the doctrine of justification by faith.

Thus, in understanding.

Destiny of the unevangelized: Are the heathen really lost?